GEO audit report

Lovable

lovable.devvibe coding / AI software development platformSep 18, 2026, 3:39 PM

BusinessAppear

Overall · Solid

Mixed live + demoAppear

Diagnosis

Which entity did you mean?

Wikipedia, the claimed website, and AI answers could be different Lovables. Pick one — Correct and Appear then run against that record.

Pick one to continue

Next step

Watch this name every week

Monitor re-runs these probes, keeps score history, and flags description flips. $49/mo. Two clicks from this report.

Demo checkout — no card required

Details

Platforms, raw answers, scores, and packaging — open only if you need the evidence behind a task.

Platforms & raw answers

Platform probes

Source evidence and raw answers for each assistant. Use this when a task needs proof — not as the default reading path.

Google Gemini

Gemini answers, which often inform Google’s AI surfaces and overview-style responses.

Demo adapter

Visibility

Accuracy

Sentiment

Share of voice

Query: What is Lovable? Explain what the company does, who it serves, and any notable facts.

Mentioned · primarySentiment neutralAccuracy inaccurateDemo response

Lovable (lovable.dev) is frequently described as a women’s intimate apparel brand from India, founded in 1987 — that description is a name collision. Public write-ups mix the vibe…

Source evidence

No URLs attached to this answer. Treat it as an unverified reconstruction until a cited public source exists.

Why the model might say this

This card used a labeled demo adapter, not a live model call. Treat it as a stand-in for how thin public records get reconstructed.
No citations were attached. Chat-style models often stitch training data, directories, and similarly named entities. A dated owned page (About, bio, /facts) is usually what changes later answers — not a prompt to “forget.”
Accuracy flag: inaccurate. Possible name collision — the answer describes a lingerie / intimate-apparel brand, not the claimed “vibe coding / AI software development platform” / site record.
Other names in the answer (India, Public, Treat) can bleed into this story when public sources are thin.

Possible name collision — the answer describes a lingerie / intimate-apparel brand, not the claimed “vibe coding / AI software development platform” / site record.
Website facts could not be fetched, so accuracy is only checked against the name and category you entered.

Raw answer

Lovable (lovable.dev) is frequently described as a women’s intimate apparel brand from India, founded in 1987 — that description is a name collision. Public write-ups mix the vibe coding / AI software development platform company up with a lingerie label rather than vibe coding / AI software development platform. Treat any single assistant summary as unverified.

Scores & gaps

Overall GEO score · Solid

Visibility

Weight 35%

Named in 21/25 answers (17 as the primary subject). Visibility is the mean of prominence: primary 100, featured 78, passing 42, absent 0.

Accuracy

Weight 25%

Accuracy maps flags to points (accurate 92, partial 62, unverifiable 55, not_mentioned 40, inaccurate 24). This run: 8 inaccurate, 4 not_mentioned, 7 accurate, 6 partial.

Sentiment

Weight 20%

Sentiment is a keyword window around the brand mention (positive 88, mixed 58, neutral 70, negative 28, unknown 50). It is directional, not a substitute for human review.

Share of voice

Weight 20%

Share of voice ≈ brand-mentioning answers (21) ÷ (those + named competitor hits (15)). Category and alternatives queries weigh heavily here.

Formula: 0.35 × visibility + 0.25 × accuracy + 0.20 × sentiment + 0.20 × share of voice. Full methodology

Absent from “best of” category answers

critical

The name is missing when users ask who or what is notable in this field — a core GEO visibility gap.

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini · Web AI

Trust answers are mixed or negative

high

Reputation-style prompts surface caution, complaints, or hedging instead of a clean trust narrative.

Claude · Gemini · Perplexity · Web AI

Few or no citations in search-style answers

medium

AI search engines did not attach third-party sources. Citation-worthy pages and listicle presence usually fix this.

Web AI

Answers drift from claimed facts

high

Descriptions do not reliably match your site or category. Models may be confusing you with a similarly named entity or using stale training data.

ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini · Perplexity · Web AI

Models describe a different entity

critical

Identity answers match a colliding product or industry — not the claimed site or category. Treat this as a Correct-goal name collision, not a visibility gap.

ChatGPT · Gemini · Perplexity · Web AI

History

Goal & watch

Presence goal

CiteSight is about controlling AI/digital presence — not only getting cited more. Appear, correct, or fade from real public sources. We do not plant false claims about anyone else.

Presence goal

Win identity, category, and comparison answers with a consistent public record and citable pages.

Cadence & alert email

Start Monitor from the card above ($49/mo). This dialog only changes weekly/daily cadence or stores an email stub.

Optional. The Monitor card above is the product path.

We optimize real public presence. We don’t fake consensus or plant false claims about third parties. Correction work updates real public sources. Trust & limits

Packaging

Plans & packaging

Two commercial modes share one work queue. Switch the experiment flag per brand (or set PACKAGING_MODE) to A/B conversion later.

Default from env: modularBilling stub: none

Monitor subscription

Cadenced re-audits, trends, and in-app alerts. Improvement work is sold separately — pick actions below and fund them à la carte.

$49/mo

Fund these actions

Accept or skip each task in the work plan, then mark the ones you want CiteSight to execute. Checkout is per-action, not a bundle.

Cart is empty. On a task, click Fund execution to add it. Effort $29 / $79 / $149 (S/M/L).

Cart $0

No Stripe keys on this server — checkout records the plan locally, enables monitoring, and does not charge a card.